Saturday, December 6, 2008
NoBama we've already given.
There is about $9.74 million of taxpayer funds available to pay for the transition, but experts say that's not enough.
My Question is who is an expert at spending almost $10million in 60 days?
Gee his December filing shows he still has $30 million left why ask for more?
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Where has Obama been?
Thursday, November 6, 2008
CDS's and Vulture Capital
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Goldman and AIG
Monday, October 13, 2008
Financial Bailout
The best policy is to leave the markets to do what they do best and keep artificial regulatory arbitrage opportunities to a minimum. This is painful but better than a series of crashes that will inevitably result from too much intervention. That is unless we do not want to be a free market any more and adopt some type of socialist system going forward.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
AIG Party Time
I think it was a poor (one of many) decision by the management of the company to continue with the plans for the event. These were however not employees but independent life agents. In the end they should have just canceled the event. It remains to be seen if AG could have sent the savings up as a dividend to the parent company where the toxic CDS's are housed since they are a separately regulated insurance entity. AG is now for sale so if they couldn't have sent to savings to the parent maybe the price (if sold) could have been reduced by $500k, although I think they are asking $18 billion.
Speaking of the bailout, the structure of the AIG "rescue", reminds me of the quote "with friends like these who needs enemies". According to the Treasury, the deal is a two-year loan, not a grant or a gift. It is costing AIG about $26.5 million per day (at the published current level of $61 billion, 12.5% on the borrowed funds and 8.5% on the un-borrowed amount). It should be noted that this money is being paid to the US government and if successful so will be the repayment of principal. If history plays out in a traditional fashion we the people will never see one red cent of the money. It will get stuck in wheels of the government and start leaking all over our congressmen. The earnings work out to about $200 per US household (110 million families earning $0.24 per day for two years at 12% interest). I know its not a lot but heck I'd take it if I were given a choice. Maybe Charlie Rangel (Dem Senator NY) could use his bit to let one of his three NYC rent controlled apartments go to a more needy family.
Monday, October 6, 2008
What should McCain do now?
Monday, September 29, 2008
US Bailout package, why it didn't pass?
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Poor old Martin Sullivan and AIG
Housing can't be outsourced to India and since a big portion of everything you and I buy now comes from China, it was about the only major commerce being done in the US. Everybody took cash out of their house (refi) or borrowed up to the hilt to buy all those nice things the Chinese wanted to ship over, (Aqua Dots). Financial institutions are like all companies and they wanted to grow so they started doing sub-prime lending when the market got saturated and the prime market didn’t grow as fast. The government saw this as good for the people and kept interest rates low to prime the pump. The Wall Street firms figured out a way to package these sub prime loans as well and AIG put a credit default wrapper around them and off they went to be sold to investor’s world wide. The rating agencies liked the fees so they bought off on some highly structured financial engineering and gave the bonds a AAA or AA rating. AIG was OK as long as there was secondary market for their guarantees. With out a secondary market AIG couldn't value the contracts they held on their books. When the government took over the extremely highly leveraged Fannie Mae and Freddy the world financial markets became very nervous and the flow of money between institutions dried up. This caused the secondary market for credit default swaps to halt. Proper accounting required AIG to write the value to zero. That caused a paper loss. It wasn't cash. When AIG took the write downs on their books the rating agencies down graded AIG which triggered a collateral call on all the guarantees AIG had issued to investors in the mortgage loans so that someone could put a pool in and buy a plasma TV made in China. AIG is a huge company with lots of cash flow from its business but the severity of the collateral calls out stripped their ability to continue to post the required collateral. They were about to file bankruptcy when the government agreed to loan them $85 billion for two years at 11.5% interest. If they had failed many other companies would have failed in a row just like a line of dominoes. As it is about 100,000 employees will probably lose their jobs at AIG and if it had failed it would have been 10 times this number.
So why did AIG take on so much risk? First the financial engineers thought they could out smart dumb lending decisions. The country was hungry for growth and refinancing home equity loans propelled consumer demand. The Fed kept interest rates low and every body was happy. But guess what, the financial engineers were wrong and defaults started percolating in the sub prime assets. The bonds starting having trouble. AIG was writing a great deal of this because they thought they could trade out the risks and the brilliant quants had it all figured out. They get bonuses on trades and they snookered poor old dumb Martin Sullivan. He was a property man and couldn’t tell a good trade from a bad one. He had no clue but he was determined to prove he could run AIG and make money like Greenberg. Traders need to be held on a tight rein and he didn’t get it. He let them do their magic so he could show profits. The problem with these financial market guys is given a free hand they will bet the house every time. The CFO was just a guilty and that is why they relieved him of his position but interestingly they didn’t let him go. I am only guessing but he probably tried to act like he knew what was going on and took the side of the quants against the auditors. I am still guessing but he probably needed to be removed because the auditors couldn’t work with such an inept and weak CFO in a cheap suit.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Entitlements and Gibson
Financial Engineering
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Rangel, coloful crook or moron
Thursday, September 4, 2008
McCain
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
McCain and Palin
Monday, September 1, 2008
Fake social secrity card gets mom with poor children deported
NB. Is the reporting of such a minor matter related to the reporting of the mean hospital that deported the illegal auto accident victim?
Friday, August 29, 2008
Sarah Palin
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Democratic Convention and the Entitled
Boiraq is a product of the hard work done by those that came before him so he could lead a privileged life. No doubt he is smart and knows how to work the system. Why else would he have found comfort in such a bitter soul mate as his wife? She was earning $360,000 per year working for a charity after he became senator. She didn't start out that well paid but it sure seems funny she got a BIG raise after he was in office. He knows the system. He's entitled. If he is not elected he will blame race as the reason and try to indict the country. Forget that the junior senator has never introduced a bill, chaired a committee, made a payroll or most importantly fought the system because he is a product of and with the system. Never however will it be his fault as there is always someone to blame, that is the way the entitled work.
Sunday, August 24, 2008
2008 Olympics
Stop! Don't go any further.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Delaware
By the way how does an anti big-company democrat rationalize Biden with the fact that a majority of finance companies and estate trusts select Delaware as the domicile of choice? Is it by being hypocritical or do they just use a shot of old fashion moral selectivism (both common liberal traits)? What ever the answer is and both choices have a good deal of evidentiary documentation, the fact remains that Delaware is a good choice of residency for the big and wealthy. The best part is you don't even need to move there or even employ many people to take advantage.
Why do so many companies and the wealthy incorporate in Delaware? Is it because of Delaware's liberal lending laws and lazi faire regulations?
Joe Biden? Your joking, right?
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Financial Melt down
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
2008 Olympics
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Groups Weigh Boycott of 'Tropic Thunder'
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Status quo
If you think about it, the people that risk life and limb to get into this country are the ones that really do want to work hard, thrive, and contribute. I dare say that the ones that stay home and grind out a life under the status status quo of land ownership inequality and poverty don't have the drive to make it in the US. My sense is that we need to actively promote rule of law, a fair and equitable justice system and property ownership rights south of our boarders as a broader solution to what drives illegals here in the first place. The ones that make it here have what it takes to contribute; we need to make sure we encourage and provide systems that promote their assimilation to be full contributors to the USA.
Sunday, August 3, 2008
At least the farmers could use the money to get a ride to the boarder so it will be easier for them to sneak across into the U.S.
NY Times
"Deported, by U.S. Hospitals" is about some poor illegal immigrant without health care insurance that was run over by a drunk driver in Florida (of course it was a drunk driver, soon we will be able to use "climate changer" with almost the same connotation). We are supposed to feel sorry for this guy because he was sent back to his own country by the hospital after treating him to the tune of $1.5mm. Unfortunately his country has no support for poor people in his condition so his toothless mother has to take care of him herself and he is going down hill. I'm sorry I don't feel compelled to want to fight for his right to stay here as a burden on society. He came, it didn't work out and he should go home, end of story.
The Times reports that Hospitals do this all the time. The way they sneak their view into the story is by stating it is "a little-known but apparently widespread practice". How could the mean hospitals do such a thing? The Times go on to report about the law suit (this is America after all) and describes the financial condition of the hospital trying to drag us into one of their typical populist arguments, "us against the large corporate villains".
Look no one wants people to get hurt but the guy was here illegally trying to make a go of it so he could send money back to his family, all the while skirting taxes and the other duties of citizenship on the way. It didn't work out, so too bad. I shiver to think that if I raped a woman with AIDS, the Times would come to my rescue by putting my sad fate on the front page as well. They could put forth the case that I must have had a troubled childhood and it really wasn't my fault and that the drug companies should have cured the woman before I raped her. Since this didn't happen they should give me free access to what ever I need to live a healthy better life than I had before being infected. Well so much for my $5 it didn't work out, again.